That tiny shock you feel is a result of the quick movement of these electrons. You can think of a shock as a river of millions of electrons flying through the air. Pretty cool, huh? Static electricity happens more often during the colder seasons because the air is drier, and it's easier to build up electrons on the skin's surface. In warmer weather, the moisture in the air helps electrons move off of you more quickly so you don't get such a big static charge. So, the next time you get a little shock from touching a doorknob, you'll know that it's just electrons jumping around.
Think of it as putting a little spark in your life! In piezoelectric materials , electrons can literally be squeezed out of place and forced to move from the region that is under strain. The voltage due to the resulting charge imbalance can then be harnessed to do work. One application is energy harvesting, whereby low-power devices can operate on energy produced by environmental vibrations.
Another application is for crystal microphones. Sound waves in the air can deflect a diaphragm connected to a piezoelectric member that converts the sound waves to an electrical signal.
In the inverse operation, the electric signal can cause a piezoelectric transducer in a loudspeaker to move, thus reproducing the sound. Localized static charges can also be affected by an intense light. This is the principle behind photocopiers and laser printers.
In photocopiers, the light may come from a projected image of a sheet of paper; in laser printers, the image is traced onto the drum by a scanning laser beam. The entire drum is initially charged by a coronal discharge wire that gives off free electrons through the air, exploiting the same principle that causes St. The electrons from the wire are then attracted to a positively charged drum. An image is then projected onto the photoconductive drum, and the charge is dissipated from the illuminated areas, while the dark areas of the image remain charged.
The charged areas on the drum can then attract oppositely charged toner particles which are then rolled onto the paper, which is backed by a positively charged roller, and fused in place by an electric heating element. Marsh noted that coal-fired power plants use electrostatic precipitators to collect particulates from smokestacks so they can be disposed of as solid waste rather than being discharged into the air.
In another application, he described how static charge is applied to herbicides that are sprayed onto weeds in a fine mist. The charged droplets are attracted to and distributed evenly over the leaves of the undesirable plants rather than falling onto the ground and being wasted. The same principle is used for electrostatic spray painting so more paint goes onto the target and less in the air and on the walls and floor of the paint room.
Their interpretation was challenged in by Silvia Piperno and her colleagues at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, who proposed an ion transfer mechanism based on the transfer of material containing polar species. Also in rubbing contacts between two polymers, bipolar charging patterns were reported in by Nikolaus Knorr of the Sony Materials Science Laboratory in Stuttgart, Germany.
Triboelectric charging results from contact between surfaces, but precisely what is meant by each of these terms is not defined or understood as they relate to charging. My interest has focused on these questions: How are triboelectric charging mechanisms related to the depth of a polymer surface the charge penetration depth , and how does this depth vary as a function of the nature of the contacts?
Many different types of contact have been employed in innovative experimental designs, but apparently no efforts have been made to study this factor as a controlled primary variable.
In the many studies of triboelectric charging of polymers, no account was taken of the fact that polymers are typically not compositionally or morphologically homogeneous as a function of depth. Figure 7. In order to study how polymer composition at different depths affects charging, the author used metal and coated beads bouncing down a polymer-layered metal plate. The results can now be seen as supporting material transfer, as metal beads gouge a deeper layer and affect the inner layers of the polymer film.
It is well known that low-surface-energy additives in polymers will migrate to the surface if films are fabricated from solution so as to allow thermodynamic equilibration of the components. I used this phenomenon while at Xerox in the mids to investigate charge penetration depth.
A series of polymers was prepared whose topmost compositions, determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, were designed to be different from the known bulk compositions. Triboelectric charging was determined by cascading small and micrometer beads, both bare metal and polymer coated, over inclined polymer films cast on aluminum plates, a method of established precision and reproducibility.
The bouncing contacts were light and brief, having a calculated contact time of 0. The surprising finding was that contact charging between two polymers relates to their topmost molecular layers, but between a metal and a polymer it relates to layers beneath the polymer surface. The hypothesis was that the former results from ion transfer between the topmost surfaces and the latter involves electrons tunneling into the bulk, thus postulating a relationship between charging mechanism and charge penetration depth, which is supported by the fact that ions are known to adsorb to polymer surfaces and electrons are considered to burrow into them.
In view of the new evidence for a material transfer mechanism, I have subsequently reported that the above results can equally well be interpreted by material transfer: Contact of a polymer film with a rough, hard metal surface, on account of its greater applied force, gouges out a deeper layer than contact with a smoother, softer polymer surface.
It follows that electron, ion and material transfer mechanisms can possibly occur simultaneously, depending on the materials and conditions of contact. For metal-insulator contacts, the electron transfer mechanism has been sufficiently established under some circumstances.
For contact between two insulators, the issue is whether material transfer is the only or the predominant mechanism in all contacts. Alternative concepts include a threshold of applied force or energy below which insufficient material is transferred to cause charge exchange, or a continuum of contact types in which electron, ion and material transfer all take place, with elevating involvement of the latter with rising force or applied pressure.
Quantitative evidence by Law and his colleagues in for ion transfer is of interest in this context. Toner coated with a cesium salt was gently tumbled with polymer-coated carriers. Linear correlations were found between charge exchange and the degree of cesium transfer as a function of mixing time, providing strong evidence for a cesium-ion transfer mechanism. Mobile ions, by their very nature, would transfer more easily than fragments of a polymer, which would require bond cleavage.
Could this mean that the mechanical forces between toner and carrier were too low for simultaneous transfer of polymer fragments? Is there a hierarchy of charge exchange mechanisms, so that several mechanisms can contribute to charging in accordance with their position in the ranking, until a limiting charge is attained?
A phenomenon that continues to puzzle experimenters is that contact charging occurs between materials of identical compositions. As stated in a review paper by Daniel J. Lacks and R. A material charges positively relative to all the materials below it in the series, which implies that a difference of composition is necessary for contact charging. Yet charging occurs when identical polymers are either pressed or rubbed together, symmetrically or asymmetrically.
Asymmetric rubbing of polymer films results when a small area of one polymer is contacted with a larger area of the other. The direction of charging is dependent on the materials involved. As is frequently the case, it is such unexpected phenomena that are likely to provide critical mechanistic information. I have proposed a mechanism for charge exchange between identical materials as an extension of the concept that the depth from which material is transferred from a polymer surface increases with applied force.
Asymmetric rubbing results in unequal forces applied to each surface, so that material from different depths would be transferred. Because polymers are typically inhomogeneous in their vertical compositions, this asymmetry would cause the transfer of material of different compositions, resulting in net charges of different signs in the bipolarly charged separated surfaces.
Alternatively, differences in the degree and type of mechanical force applied to each surface could result in subtle differences in the mechanochemistry, chemical reactions resulting from the application of mechanical force.
Sufficiently different compositions of polymer fragment ions could be created at the two surfaces where charge exchange occurs. This new mechanism could also apply to symmetrical rubbing and pressing of identical polymers on the basis that small, unintentional degrees of asymmetry could result in sufficient asymmetric compositional transfer to result in charging.
It would apply equally well to charging between materials of different compositions and, in this way, contributes to the understanding of the general material transfer mechanism. Differences in hardness or softness could also contribute to asymmetric material transfer. The use of polymers designed to have compositional inhomogeneity as a function of depth, such as those described in experiments earlier, would provide a sensitive test for this hypothesis because the transfer of materials with different compositions would be easily detected.
Triboelectric charging of compositionally identical materials also happens with particulate matter, as in dust storms and the industrial handling of fine particles. Again, such occurrences could come from asymmetric contacts that result from differences in particle size. The larger particles charge positively and the smaller particles negatively.
An electron transfer mechanism has been proposed in which electrons trapped in high-energy surface states transfer to lower-energy states in other particles during collision. Previous research has been done with the assumption that surface compositions and other surface characteristics do not vary as a function of particle size, which could be incorrect. Figure 8. The everyday occurrence of static may soon be better understood due to new research.
David R. Frazier Photolibrary, Inc. There is an increasing need to create materials that do not charge upon contact, perhaps most importantly because of the continued miniaturization of electronic equipment, which renders it even more susceptible to damage by even low-voltage discharge.
Another motivation is pure research, whose objective is the understanding of natural phenomena and observable facts with no specific application or problem solving in mind.
For contact between two polymers, studies of the interaction between variables relating to polymer composition and contact type should throw light on key questions such as: For contacts involving polymers containing mobile ions, what are the factors affecting the contribution of ion versus material transfer? And when a metal is involved, what are the factors affecting the contribution of electron versus material transfer?
In addition, recent developments have brought attention to the need for the application of mechanochemistry, which is central to the material transfer mechanism. Integrating the separate pieces of the puzzle into a coherent overall picture will take multidisciplinary efforts. Complex problems increasingly require input from several scientific disciplines.
Studies have shown that the average size of teams required to produce peer-reviewed publications over the past 50 years has increased by 20 percent each decade.
It is likely that this once physics-only field will continue to grow and find answers in many other realms of the sciences. Skip to main content. Login Register. Rubbing a balloon on your head or dragging your feet on the carpet will build up a charge, but so will ordinary walking or repeatedly touching your head with a balloon! Rubbing materials together can help move charge more quickly because more surface area is being contacted. Friction has nothing to do with the charge. An important thing to consider when doing any of these activities is the weather: humidity in the air can make it difficult to build up charges, causing experiments to behave in unexpected ways!
Triboelectric series — A list that ranks various materials according to their tendency to gain or lose electrons. To purchase a fly stick or Van de Graaff generator: Arbor Scientific. Have you ever rubbed a balloon on your head? If you have, you may wonder why your hair stood up on end! Objectives Describe the movement of electrons from one material to another.
Determine the resulting charge of two materials rubbing together.
0コメント